I recently posted a question to the participants in my WhatsApp broadcast , that ‘ if Google knows everything, then why don’t we predict the likely criminal behaviour of a person ’ (Courtesy– Viraj P., SIBM Pune graduate & a good friend of mine ). I had received interesting arguments which I have collated in this article, supplemented with my own research. ‘ A man is innocent until he commits a crime ’. Conspiracy to commit a crime is not a crime unto itself. Moreover, there cannot be a bigger crime than incriminating a person. Even AI make predictions with 95% accuracy. Hence, this would imply that 5% of the accused might face false convictions. In addition, we should not pay heed as to what somebody thinks about an event that ‘might’ occur in the future, says my friend Soumik. The presumption of innocence , sometimes referred to by the Latin expression “ ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat” (the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who den...